The city of Chicago fired Daniel Pernice after he was arrested off duty for disorderly conduct and possessing cocaine. He argued that his addiction was a disability and having drugs was "an integral part" of the disability. But the court said the city was right in firing Pernice for possessing drugs in violation of work rules. Bottom line: If you wouldn't accept egregious behavior from another employee, you don't have to accept it from one who is
an alcoholic or drug addict. (Pernice v. Chicago, No. 00-1865, 7th Cir., 2001)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/961/addiction-isnt-a-license-for-unacceptable-behavior "
- Suspect employee has relapsed into drug use? Never say so without proof
- Trouble-free terminations: 5 smart strategies for managers
- Appeals court: Attorney fines OK to stop frivolous lawsuits
- The details matter when documenting discipline
- Checking up on alleged leave abuser? Document why you suspect particular employee