• LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Grooming policies: Establish limits, not discrimination

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Human Resources

Frank's boss asked him to quit wearing his earring to work. Frank refused, arguing that women in the office were allowed to wear earrings. He was fired and then sued for sex discrimination. (Kleinsorge v. Eyeland Corp., No. 99-5025, E.D. Pa., 2000)

Brian and his buddies at work protested Blockbuster's new grooming policy that prohibited men, but not women, from having long hair. They refused to cut their locks, so Blockbuster cut 'em loose. They also sued. (Harper v. Blockbuster, No. 97-4364, 11th Cir., 1998)

The result of both cases: wins for the employer. That's because courts have set a clear rule on grooming policies: You can establish different grooming and dress requirements for men and women as long as your rules are enforced evenly.

As the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has noted, "minor differences in personal appearance regulations that reflect customary modes of grooming do not constitute sex discrimination."

Key point: You must equally enforce your policy. If you forbid all workers to wear earrings but discipline only men who violate the rule, then you're discriminating. Likewise, your policy would be on shaky ground if it required women but not men in the same jobs to wear uniforms.

One employer landed in court for objecting to the hairstyles worn by an African-American woman, although the hairdos met the standards in a written grooming policy.

Put safety first

You can also set grooming and dress policies based on safety reasons. You should, for example, ban employees who work around machinery from wearing certain jewelry and loose-fitting clothes.

Don't jump to conclusions about the impact of someone's appearance. One company argued that a beard would prevent a safety mask from fitting a worker's face securely. But the court ruled that the mask actually fit better with the beard.

Some rules that appear neutral could be discriminatory, such as a policy barring beards. Many black men suffer from a skin disorder that is irritated by shaving.

You're on solid legal ground if you want to prohibit appearances that would disrupt your business. For example, a medical center ordered a worker to cover up his tattoo that read "HIV positive" and the court upheld the order. (Baldetta v. Harborview,

116 F. 3d 482)

When to make exceptions

Courts generally give employers great leeway to set dress and grooming policies, including allowing different rules among departments. But there are exceptions, the biggest being allowing for religious beliefs and practices.

Title VII says you have to reasonably accommodate a worker's religious attire as long as it doesn't pose an "undue hardship" on your business. Courts, however, have been all over the map on what constitutes a hardship, so make sure your grooming policy offers plenty of flexibility.

If an employee complains that your policy runs against her religious teachings, check with the religious authority to ensure the employee's interpretation is correct. This has been a problem in several cases with Islamic women who wear head scarves, or hijabs. The Council on American-Islamic Relations, (202) 488-8787, offers a booklet, Employer's Guide to Islamic Religious Practices.

Note: Workers don't have to belong to an established religion to be protected from religious discrimination, they only need to have a sincerely held belief.

Finally, determine how you will enforce your grooming policy. For example, will you send workers home for the day without pay or let them change clothing if they don't meet the standards?

Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!

Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...

We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.

The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.

" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/948/grooming-policies-establish-limits-not-discrimination "

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Whelan Easley March 24, 2012 at 1:31 pm

I am a college student who recently took a job at jack in the box so I could have a little extra income outside of my student loans. During my computer based training, I signed a corporate document that said non dangling earrings, neatly shaven beards, and tattoos that didn’t prove offensive were allowed. I have all three that meet the requirements. Afterwards I was told that this is a franchise store and that I would have to remove my ear plugs, wear a long sleeve shirt covering up my Oregon and hammer tattoo, and shave off my ‘soul patch’. I was given nothing to sign prior to employment other than the corporate policy clearly stating that my earrings, tattoos and soul patch were all within policies regulations. Can this franchise impose rules that contradict agreements I signed as part of my employment?


Leave a Comment