By Charles Lentz, Esq.
If your organization isn’t already planning or implementing measures to cut labor costs, it may soon have to. News that the United States has been in a recession since December 2007 suggests that HR professionals should prepare to reduce the labor burden—if only as a contingency plan.
Frequently—and too simply—the decision comes down to which employees to lay off. But, reductions in force—RIFs—are not the only mechanism for achieving labor-cost savings. It pays to consider alternative approaches before deciding to begin layoffs or voluntary-exit incentive programs.
The pros and cons of RIFs
Whether voluntary or involuntary, workforce reductions have positive attributes. RIFs are relatively easy to conceptualize, and your employees may even expect one is coming. RIF decisions can be made quickly and the results are predictable—the cost savings are easy to calculate. In some circumstances, a tempo...(register to read more)
- Should you offer a phased-retirement program?
- Worker gets extra breaks for prayer, but co-workers complain: What to do
- Apple co-op settles sex and race harassment complaints
- Understand GINA's new prohibitions on misuse of genetic info
- Ohio Supreme Court fills gap for those fired after injury, but before filing for workers' comp