Pushed to do more with less, many employers are asking employees to work longer hours. That can cause workers to lose sleep and may even result in diagnoses of insomnia. But not everyone who is sleep deprived and takes medication to sleep is disabled and entitled to reasonable accommodations, such as a shorter workday.
Recent case: Victoria worked as a lawyer for Discovery Communications. She got kudos for her skills but was rated poorly for being disorganized and having rocky relationships with co-workers.
While away on business, she got sick and saw a doctor. He told her she might have a sleep disorder. On her return, she went to another doctor who diagnosed insomnia, based on Victoria’s report that she slept less than four hours per night. She also got a sleep aid and took a few weeks of.
At that time, her doctors cleared her for work with an eight-hour workday restriction.
When she was ready to return to work, she demanded a flexible schedule that only required her to be in the office a few hours every day. Discovery denied her request. Shortly after, she was fired for inaccurate time records and being argumentative with co-workers.
She sued, alleging disability discrimination.
But the court refused to consider her disabled. It reasoned that poor sleep is common and that Victoria’s doctors no longer believed she was impaired. (Anderson v. Discovery, No. 11-2195, 4th Cir., 2013)
- After career ups and downs, Ironton officer is still fired
- Use good notes to shoot down retaliation suits
- Protect against retaliation suits by conducting independent and 'blind' internal investigations
- Supreme Court to hear Florida FedEx drivers' discrimination case
- Tap into the lawsuit-saving power of self-reviews