Good news for employers faced with a former employee who tries to add defamation to his case based on alleged employer misrepresentation. What you say to an agency like the EEOC can’t be grounds for a separate defamation action.
Recent case: Tommie sued Wells Fargo, alleging that he was terminated because of his race. He also said the company defamed him when it told the EEOC (which was investigating the case) that Tommie had been fired for not meeting sales quotas.
But the court tossed out that claim. It noted that even if what Wells Fargo told the EEOC was false, it couldn’t be the basis for a defamation lawsuit. (Dawson v. Wells Fargo, No. 11-2456, DC MN, 2012)
Final note: Of course, lying under oath is still a criminal offense—perjury. It just isn’t grounds for a separate defamation lawsuit.
- Fort Worth lumber yard hammered for age bias
- Does the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act protect employees other than women?
- Cut lawsuit risk by filling vacant position with similar person
- Case settled with EEOC? Don't cave when employee tries to revive parts of the deal
- Revise your overly complex employee review methods