It’s perfectly legitimate to try to prevent allegations of sexual harassment and favoritism by instituting a policy banning romantic relationships between co-workers—or between certain types of co-workers, like supervisors and subordinates.
But what if two employees get married? As this case shows, as long as you apply your rules evenly, you can require one spouse to resign.
Recent case: Dollie Ayers-Jennings, who worked for discount retailer Fred’s, married a co-worker. When they returned from their honeymoon, both were called into their supervisor’s office.
They were told that one of them would have to resign in order to avoid violating the company’s nonfraternization rule, which says married couples can’t work in the same division.
Since Ayers-Jennings earned less than her husband, she quit. She sued for race discrimination, saying that three white couples continued working at Fred’s after their weddings.
But Fred’s argued that those couples didn’t work in the same division, nor did one spouse supervise the other.
The court said that since the policy was specific, and since there were no open jobs that either Dollie or her husband could transfer into, the company was within its rights to request a resignation. (Ayers-Jennings v. Fred’s, No. 10-6228, 6th Cir., 2012)
- Do you need a music policy for the 'iPod generation'?
- Address harassment complaint with thorough investigation—and quick action to fix problems
- HR dept. of one? Groom yourself to move to a big firm
- Training and development spending ticks up 1%
- Planning for the worst: Implementing a workplace violence policy