Philadelphia-based Imperial Security will pay $50,000 to settle EEOC charges it discriminated against a woman and fired her because of her religious attire.
When Julie Holloway-Russell, a devout Muslim, applied to become a part-time security guard at the Philadelphia Convention Center, she wore a khimar to her job interview. A khimar is a kind of scarf that some Muslim women wear to cover their hair, ears and neck. Imperial Security hired her.
She wore the khimar to work on her first day, but was told to remove it because it violated the company dress code. She explained that her religious beliefs required her to wear it and refused to take it off. The company terminated her.
Holloway-Russell filed a religious discrimination complaint with the EEOC.
In addition to the $50,000 settlement, Imperial Security agreed to hire an equal employment opportunity officer to receive discrimination and retaliation complaints. The company will also change its policies to allow for religious accommodation and provide annual anti-discrimination training to all employees.
Note: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act requires employers to accommodate employees’ religious beliefs as long as doing so does not cause an undue hardship. Employers that fire first without exploring religious accommodations are automatically in violation of the law.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/29600/muslim-scarf-ban-costs-50k-for-philadelphia-security-firm "
Related Articles...
- Be consistent: Don't slap harasser on wrist, then fire victim
- Is there a way to ensure sensitive investigation records remain confidential?
- Beware national-origin bias charges following criticism of accent
- How should we structure a buy-sell agreement?
- An age-Old problem: 'Stray remarks' have a way of coming home







{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
She has to work at something, Muslims are not supposed to be idle or lazy, lol……
That’s great that the company was made to be more accomodating but I don’t know how I feel about these ridiculous payouts, do you really think she deserves $50k for being wrongfully terminated? All in all it was an expensive lesson to learn I hope more companies realize how wrong it is to discriminate against pple because they choose to dress modestly!
Hahaha!! Now she don’t have to work!! You go girl take some of that money and pay Zakat for the blessing Allah)swt) has given you!!.
Miro, you are incorrect. Khimar is not a face veil. The niqab is the face veil. Khimar is a word which means head covering from head to the chest area or longer. Khimars are usually longer than the headscarf, either to the elbow, waist, or floor length. Please do not confuse people with those terms.
Khimar is not a scarf to cover the head, neck and face, it is a face veil. So instead of using Arabic words incorrectly, you can just say head scarf and everyone will know what that means.
Khimar refers exclusively to the headscarf when it is worn to cover the hair, ears and neck, as correctly stated in the article. Khimar is actually the word used in the Qur’an, and in that text is referring to covering the hair. The ‘niqab’ usually refers to the veil that covers the face, leaving the eyes visible. There are some “combination” items of clothing, that cover both the hair and the face, such as the burqa. These terms and styles that they refer to can vary all across the Muslim world. I agree that descriptive words such as ‘headscarf’ should have ben used in this article so that it’s clear for those who aren’t familiar with the Arabic terms.