Nothing speeds a disappointed job-seeker’s trip to court like a selection process based on an employer’s use of subjective criteria to make the hiring decision. That’s especially true if the biggest deciding factor is subjective, while objective factors receive lesser weight.
Examples of objective factors: Test scores, physical assessments, skills measurements, training, education and experience.
Examples of subjective factors that lead to lawsuits: Soft skills like cooperation and being a team player.
Using subjective criteria to make promotion decisions can spur litigation, too.
Recent case: Tiffanye Wesley, a black woman, worked as a firefighter and earned good reviews. As soon as she became eligible for promotion to captain, she began applying whenever an opening occurred. Each time, the fire department passed her over in favor of white men.
She finally sued, alleging that her race or sex kept her from being promoted even though she was qualified.
She pointed out that two of the three steps in the promotion review process used entirely objective criteria. First, she had to pass a written test. Next, she had to pass a physical skills test. She did well at both of those stages, was deemed eligible for promotion and placed on the promotion list.
But she said the third step tripped her up each time. The fire department convened a roundtable of department officials to narrow the final promotion candidate list. During the roundtables, senior discussed each of the eligible candidates. Subjective criteria such as and communication ability were apparently highly prized at this stage. The fire chief then made the ultimate decision.
Wesley pointed out that during the entire time she sought promotion, the department never selected a woman. Only white men got the coveted promotions.
The fire department argued that it could legitimately use subjective factors in the selection process. It contended that just because candidates passed the first two tests did not mean that they were qualified. Instead, according to the chief, only those candidates who also met the final subjective criteria were qualified to become captains.
But the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. The court said that, according to the chief’s logic, there could only ever be one qualified candidate for any promotion—the one who actually got the job. That would mean no one could ever challenge any promotion. The court sent the case back to court for a jury trial. (Wesley v. Arlington County, No. 08-2063, 4th Cir., 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/10851/use-objective-criteriaand-beware-subjective-judgment-callswhen-deciding-promotions "
- Dealing with employees who fear HIV
- To prevent retaliation claim, check back within weeks following employee's complaint
- How not to handle FMLA leave: Do what Chicago did to a seriously ill employee
- Prepare for lawsuit if you change hiring criteria in middle of selection process
- Moving on after missing that promotion