Sandra Bruff was a counselor for an(EAP), but she balked at helping employees deal with their homosexual or extramarital relationships. That kind of advice violated her religious beliefs.
When the company learned about her objections, it asked her to put in writing exactly what counseling responsibilities she wanted to be excused from. The medical center tried to accommodate her by shifting responsibilities among the EAP counselors but decided it would create an undue hardship on the other counselors and clients.
The company gave her several options, including the help of a job counselor to find another position inside the company. Bruff lost one position to someone more qualified and she refused even to apply for others. Instead, she sued and a jury awarded her more than $2 million for religious discrimination, which a judge then reduced to about $300,000.
The appeals court threw out the entire verdict, however, saying the employer had offered a reasonable accommodation. (Bruff v. North Mississippi Health Services Inc., No. 99-60175, 5th Cir., 2001)
Advice: While you must try to accommodate a worker's legitimate religious beliefs, you can draw the line at efforts that would cause an "undue hardship" for your business. The courts have made it tough to prove an "undue hardship," but if you feel you're at that point and can prove it, stick to your guns.
Also, accommodations are a two-way street. Employees have to participate actively in finding a new position or accommodation. The "sit-back-and-sue" tactic won't sit well with the court.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- EEOC weighs in: Most sexual harassment training doesn't work
- Review policies in wake of same-sex ruling
- Take 10: How to handle the California Labor Code mandate to provide midshift breaks
- EEOC tests digital charge system to handle discrimination complaints