The 6 kinds of terminations … and how to avoid lawsuits for each one — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

The 6 kinds of terminations … and how to avoid lawsuits for each one

Get PDF file

by on
in Employment Law,Firing,FMLA Guidelines,Human Resources,Leaders & Managers,Management Training

Terminations are the spark to many employment lawsuits. And for each of the six kinds, there are some common steps employers can take to make sure they defend themselves if the termination is challenged in court:

1. NEW HIRES. When new employees are dismissed, their legal claims typically assert they didn’t know about performance expectations or had no training. Or, they may sue if they know of other employees who didn’t perform well yet kept their jobs.

The key to defending such claims: Completely document the training and any failure to meet expectations, while showing that you uniformly applied the rules.

Get authoritative answers to the thorniest employment law questions...

2. ABSENTEEISM. Again, documentation is critical. Document that you notified the employee of the attendance policy and the employee failed to comply. Also be able to show that you uniformly applied the policy.

Make sure managers don’t use protected absences (FMLA, ADA or state laws, such as jury-duty absences) as the basis for termination decisions.

3. MISCONDUCT. Employees terminated for violating conduct rules often claim they were “found guilty” based entirely on management’s report to HR.

It is too late to get the worker’s side after termination. So always get the employee to provide an explanation before a decision is made. During the investigation, you have the legitimate option of placing the employee on a leave of absence.

4. SUDDENLY DECLINING PERFORMANCE. The employee’s performance actually may be deteriorating—or management’s perception of the performance may have changed. Sometimes it’s both.

For example, a stressful family situation may distract the employee. On the other hand, a new supervisor or different job duties may lead to a different judgment.

In these cases, it’s prudent to go slowly. Include the employee in your discussions about the cause and look for ways to improve. Document those discussions.

If performance doesn’t improve, you will want to be able to say you made a reasonable effort to help the employee keep his or her job. The employee also is less likely to feel he or she was unfairly treated.

Finally, employers should try to develop objective evaluation systems that don’t rely solely on any one supervisor’s subjective opinion.

Get everything you need to know about relevant legal developments at your fingertips: Recent cases. Legal strategies used against employers. Mistakes employers often make. New court rulings – and what they mean to you.
Get it here.

5. RESIGNATIONS. The risk: Employees can claim they were “constructively discharged.” If the former employee can show that working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would feel there was no alternative but to resign, then the resignation is equivalent to a termination.

So, when employees quit, it may be tempting to tell them, “Good riddance!” But a safer strategy is the opposite: Ask them to reconsider. Doing so may preclude a constructive-discharge claim, or at least make it easier to defend.

6. THE DANGEROUS ‘NO REASON’ TERMINATION. In at-will states, employers that have done what is necessary to retain their at-will status don’t need a good reason (or any reason at all) to fire employees. However, employers rely on this rule at their peril.

Everyone expects some reasonable explanation for a termination, especially if the employee is a member of a protected class (e.g., race, gender, age, religion, disability).

To defend a discrimination claim, always be able to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason. And always have the decision-maker document the reason. (If the decision-maker leaves the company, you’ll want to be able to explain to a jury why the employee was fired.)

It seems like every day, employers have new regulations and laws to follow. Many seem like traps rather than laws. It’s hard to hear about these cases without wishing you had a personal lawyer to sort it all out for you.

Obviously, you’re not about to make every workplace decision with an attorney whispering into your ear! But you can have HR Specialist: Employment Law on your side. To answer your questions. To cut through the “legalese.” To give you reliable, legally authoritative opinions on the treacherous legal maze that awaits you every day.

book coversSo try HR Specialist: Employment Law. Try it now while you can examine it at no risk … and receive absolutely free two special bonus reports, Fire at Will: Terminating Your Employees Legally and Hire at Will. You’ll also get FREE access to our exclusive Employment Lawyer Network.

Subscribe today — 100% money-back guarantee!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: