Q. One of our employees was hired to a position that requires her to drive to customers’ offices. When we hired her, she reviewed and signed a job description that included a statement “that transportation was an essential function of her job.” Public transportation is not a realistic option. She recently received test results suggesting she might be suffering from multiple sclerosis. She provided a return-to-work slip indicating she would be able to return to work on a part-time basis but would not be able to drive or do heavy lifting. We told her we cannot accommodate her restrictions, but we provided a four-month leave of absence. Assuming she will not be able to drive when she returns, are we within our rights to discharge her? Are we going to violate her rights under the ADA or Michigan disability laws?
A. Federal and state disability statutes do not require employers to find work for employees who are not able to perform their own jobs with or without an accommodation. Rather, the law requires employers to accommodate in an effort to help employees perform their own jobs. The fact that a person with a disability can perform some other job does not matter.
Your written job description makes it clear that driving is an essential function of the job. Assuming there is no accommodation that would enable your employee to perform the duties of the job she held, you can regard her as not qualified, and you may terminate her.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Sick leave and FMLA: Should you call off your call-in policy?
- Trump administration seeks 30-day delay for overtime rule appeal
- Say no to accommodations if 'disability' barely scratches the surface of credibility
- Broward's wellness program survives ADA court challenge