Employees who are out ondon’t enjoy any special protection against being fired for unrelated reasons. If you can show you would have terminated the worker even if she had not taken leave, chances are the termination won’t be seen as FMLA interference or retaliation for taking FMLA leave.
However, such a move will probably trigger a lawsuit anyway. That’s why you must be able to convince a court that the employee would have been discharged even if she hadn’t taken leave. That’s easiest if you can point to something like a planned reorganization, an already-made disciplinary decision—or obvious serious misconduct that came to light during the absence.
Otherwise, you may end up facing a jury over allegations you terminated the worker for taking FMLA leave.
Recent case: Miriam worked as a ticket agent for a tour bus company for about five years. She told her boss she needed to take time off work t...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- When same manager hires and fires, it's unlikely to be discrimination
- No need to juice up severance package next year
- Mandatory firing after year's absence doesn't violate ADA requirements
- Rush to fire or demote pregnant employee often backfires