Here’s a reminder to stick with solid explanations when. If you have facts to back up your decision, an employee’s spurious claim of some sort of discrimination likely will be dismissed.
Recent case: Ina, a recently naturalized citizen originally from the Ukraine, was terminated from her billing job with the Department of Veterans Affairs during her probationary period. Her supervisor documented several incidents in which she concluded Ina had been rude to co-workers and the supervisor.
Ina sued, alleging national origin discrimination. She argued that she had been fired for behavior that was reflective of her national origin, telling the court that she may have seemed argumentative and rude because, as a Ukrainian, it is in her nature to speak loudly.
The court tossed her lawsuit, citing the VA’s disciplinary documentation. (Brez v. McDonald, MD PA, 2017)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Savannah police chief sued; 'paramour favoritism' at issue
- The Obama years: 4 predictions for employment law circa 2012
- Leave off job application any language that limits time frames for employee to sue
- Jilted lover's badgering could become your problem