When it comes to judging whether an employee's serious health condition qualifies forAct ( ) protection, require at least three consecutive, full days of incapacity. A new court ruling has clarified that partial days won't be enough to trigger FMLA protections.
Recognize, however, that you should apply that "three consecutive calendar days" requirement only for the initial period of deciding whether a condition is serious enough to trigger FMLA. Once a condition is FMLA-protected, any subsequent absence can be for less time, as long as it's based on the original medical condition.
Recent case: A hospital account rep missed several partial workdays over a 10-day period due to an injury, so she was fired due to excessive. She claimed her partial days of incapacity met the definition of a "serious health condition," so she sued under the FMLA. But a district court and appeals court sided with the hospital, saying the employee's ailment didn't rise to the "serious" level.
Court's reasoning:say a serious condition, among other things, must involve "a period of incapacity (i.e. inability to work, attend school, perform other regular daily activities) of more than three consecutive calendar days." The appeals court added to this definition, saying three days means three full days. Specifically, "calendar day" refers to a "whole day, not to part of a day," the court said. (Russell v. North Broward Hospital, No. 02-13343, 11th Cir., 2003)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Reversing FMLA denial doesn't end retaliation claim
- Beware cryptic notes in your HR files--they could be used against you in a later lawsuit
- Salary deduction for part-Week absence doesn't always destroy exemption
- It's your call: Intermittent FMLA leave following birth is up to the employer