Single comment not enough to form basis of discrimination lawsuit — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Single comment not enough to form basis of discrimination lawsuit

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Human Resources

A single, isolated comment—especially if the speaker isn’t a co-worker or supervisor—isn’t sufficient grounds for alleging discrimination. Complaining about it doesn’t amount to protected activity.

Recent case: Antron and John, who are black, were pipefitters working through a temp agency. After they were terminated for alleged financial reasons, they sued, claiming discrimination and retaliation for reporting discrimination.

At the core of their initial complaint was a single comment they heard from the owner of property where they were laying pipe. That owner was coincidently the safety director for the company that Antron and John had been assigned to work for. He apparently accused the two of “n****r-rigging” the fence around his property and said he’d get them fired if a cow escaped. They reported the comment to their temp agency supervisors.

The men argued that by reporting the comment, they engaged in protected activity and that they had been terminated in retaliation for doing so.

But the court rejected their reasoning. Instead, it concluded that a single offensive comment—especially when the speaker wasn’t a fellow employee—couldn’t possibly have been enough to make the men believe their employer discriminated on the basis of race. Because the men’s belief was unreasonable, they hadn’t engaged in protected activity and weren’t protected from retaliation (if that’s what their discharge was.) The case was dismissed. (Castleberry, et al., v. STI Group, et al., No. 4:15-CV-00153, MD PA, 2015)

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

newjerseywork December 9, 2015 at 6:41 pm

The fact that these men even filed a suit is almost laughable. From the above information, it’s pretty clear that they were upset about getting fired and grabbed whatever they could and took their employer to court with it. As this author attorney states here: to constitute discrimination, the employer must be trying to sabotage the employees career. being fired for financial reasons is far from trying to sabotage someones career. The comment the customer made may not have been appropriate, but that’s doesn’t mean you go after your employer because of it!


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: