Substandard work before FMLA leave? Beware retaliation suit for later poor reviews — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Substandard work before FMLA leave? Beware retaliation suit for later poor reviews

Get PDF file

by on
in FMLA Guidelines,Human Resources

Don’t think that just because an employee was a poor performer before she requested FMLA leave, a poor review after the request can’t be retaliation.

If there is other evidence of retaliation (like a direct statement that FMLA leave was a factor), then the previous poor performance won’t be much of a defense.

Recent case: Yvonne got fairly poor reviews. Then she asked for FMLA leave. Shortly afterward, she got an even worse review.

She sued, alleging retaliation for asking for FMLA leave.

In court, she presented evidence of a taped phone conversation with her supervisor in which the supervisor allegedly said her FMLA leave request was considered a negative factor in the review.

That was enough for the court to send Yvonne’s retaliation claim to trial. (Spaulding v. New York City Department of Education, No. 12-CIV-3041, ED NY, 2015)

Final note: Remind supervisors that FMLA leave is an absolute right. It can’t be used as a negative factor, even if granting leave is inconvenient or downright disruptive. It’s up to management to find a way to cope with FMLA absences; they can’t blame the employee for work left undone or schedule disruptions.

Supervisors should certainly never voice any objections to FMLA leave or suggest in any way that taking leave is irresponsible, disruptive or unprofessional. In a growing number of retaliation cases, such negative comments lie at the heart of employees’ lawsuits.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: