He filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board claiming his notes on union newsletters were protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and that the company violated the NLRA when it fired him.
He was half right. The NLRB ruled that the employee’s comments were protected activity.
However, lying to company investigators was not. The NLRB said the company was within its rights to terminate an employee for lying during an investigation.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- How responsible is a parent company for an action filed against a subsidiary company?
- Be wary of firing employees for aggressive union organizing
- NLRB piles on joint-employer charges against McDonald's
- Managers can refuse bias-tainted orders, court says