Accepting suspension doesn’t equal admission of guilt — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Accepting suspension doesn’t equal admission of guilt

Get PDF file

by on
in Firing,Human Resources

Employees who lose their jobs be­­­­cause of willful misconduct aren’t eligible for unemployment benefits. But whether misconduct occurred can be called into question by any agreement the employer and employee may have signed calling for a suspension instead of termination.

Recent case: Craig, a prison guard, was fired for breaking a rule concerning prisoners’ property. He requested reinstatement and suspension. The prison agreed. However, Craig never returned to work (he apparently didn’t get the decision) and was fired.

When he applied for unemployment benefits, the prison system said his agreement to be suspended meant he admitted breaking the rule. But the court disagreed and said unless the agreement spelled out a confession, it wasn’t an admission. Craig got the benefits. (Bennett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 710-CD-2014, Com­­mon­­wealth Court, 2015)

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: