Conventional wisdom has been that isolated or “stray” remarks alone by an employer do not prove discriminatory intent. Conventional wisdom may be wrong.
A recent 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals case (Tomassi v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., 478 F.3d 111, 2007) has clarified what it deemed a misconception of the true meaning of the term “stray remarks.”
‘In your day and age’
In Tomassi, the plaintiff was a supervisor at an apartment complex. When she was terminated, she filed an age discrimination lawsuit. In it, she claimed that she had been fired because she was older than other employees and had been targeted for termination because of her age.
Of course, she had no direct proof. After all, employers seldom come right out and say they are terminating an employee because she’s older than 40.
But she had to come up with something—and she did. As proof of her claim, she pointed to conversations her supervisor began wit...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- The HR I.Q. Test: September '12
- TV station employee returns stolen documents ... in shreds!
- Suspect employees of theft? Questions are OK, but detaining risks 'False imprisonment' claim
- Responding to an office affair? Don't forget the 'fair' part