Have you ever worried that, after terminating an older worker, replacing him with a younger one might look like age discrimination? That concern is likely unfounded if you had a legitimate, business-related reason for the earlier termination.
Recent case: David, who was over age 60, was discharged from his heating and air conditioning position and replaced with a younger worker. He sued, alleging age discrimination.
But the employer showed that it fired David for tardiness,and safety violations—all documented with months of warnings. That was enough to get the case tossed out. (Hu v. UGL Services, No. 13-CIV-4251, SD NY, 2014)
Final note: Under federal law, employees must show that age was the “but for” reason for a termination. Under New York state law, the standard is lower—employees just have to prove that age was a motivating factor.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- It's business as usual, even after sex change
- Make it one of HR's goals: Ensure everyone gets training on harassment
- EEOC settles landmark sexual orientation case
- REDA revisited: It doesn't cover discrimination claims addressed by federal law