A. According to guidance from the U.S. Department of Labor, under the provisions of the FMLA an employee on FMLA leave is not protected from actions that would have affected him or her if he or she had never taken FMLA leave.
For example, if a shift has been eliminated or overtime decreased, an employee would not be entitled to return to work that shift or the original overtime hours. If an employee is laid off during the period of FMLA leave, the employer must be able to show that the employee would not have been employed at the time of reinstatement.
It is important to provide documentation that other employment actions (such as discharge or reduction of hours) would have affected the employee had he or she not been on FMLA leave, as it is illegal to discriminate against employees for taking FMLA leave.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Supreme Court outlook: All quiet on employment-law front
- Failure to provide FMLA notice doesn't necessarily mean employers will pay in court
- Can mental health problems be covered by the FMLA in addition to the ADA?
- Is there an FLSA violation hiding in your company handbook?