Pittsburgh-based Maxim Healthcare faces a suit from the EEOC after it refused to place an HIV-positive healthcare worker at a Veterans Administration hospital.
According to the complaint, the man applied for the position and Maxim extended a conditional job offer pending a physical examination. The exam revealed the man’s HIV-positive status, but placed no restrictions on his ability to work. Despite the clearance, Maxim withdrew the employment offer.
The man filed a complaint with the EEOC alleging Maxim violated the ADA when it withdrew the offer. The parties failed to resolve the dispute through the commission’s conciliation process.
The EEOC then filed suit, alleging Maxim regarded the man as disabled when he was not and discriminated against him because of his HIV-positive status in violation of the ADA. The EEOC found no wrongdoing by the VA.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Temporary injuries aren't disabilities under the ADA
- What's harassment? Courts will look at view of a 'reasonable person'--not the employee
- Educate employees about the value of disability insurance
- Isolated slur isn't grounds for harassment lawsuit