TheAct ( ) requires workers to give their employers notice of their need for leave. But you have the right to deny leave when the provided information fails to support the employee's stated need for the leave.
As the following case proves, if you fire an employee for taking unqualified, you won't be forced to rehire the employee if he or she can later prove that the leave truly did qualify for the FMLA. Employees need to show their cards upfront or not at all.
Recent case: Steve Aubuchon's wife was pregnant and past her due date, so he wanted to stay with her until she had the baby. He told his employer that he'd be taking FMLA leave.
When he submitted his, he didn't indicate that his wife had a "serious health condition" or pregnancy-related complication prior to giving birth, as required by the FMLA for pre-birth leave. So the organization denied the leave and fired him for .
Soon after that, Aubuchon submitted a note from his wife's doctor stating that his wife, in fact, did have pregnancy-related complications. The organization refused to reverse the termination, so Aubuchon sued under the FMLA.
A federal appeals court tossed out his case. Reason: Aubuchon failed to put his employer on notice that his wife had complications covered by the FMLA.
The court said he couldn't "fix" that after the fact because "employees should not be encouraged to mousetrap their employers by requesting FMLA leave on patently insufficient grounds and then, after the leave is denied, obtaining a doctor's note that indicates sufficient grounds existed." (Aubuchon v. Knauf Fiberglass, No. 03-1382, 7th Cir., 2004)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- When worker returns from FMLA leave, it's OK to assign equivalent job at different location
- Is it possible to apply FMLA retroactively?
- FMLA notice: Rely on what you know--not policy
- Bush to halt Clinton-era rule opening UI funds for paid leave