U.S. Supreme Court addresses arbitration of noncompete agreements — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

U.S. Supreme Court addresses arbitration of noncompete agreements

Get PDF file

by on
in Employment Law,Human Resources

In one of its first rulings of the 2012-13 term, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued an opinion involving arbitration of noncompete agreements.

In Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Howard, the High Court ruled that the Oklahoma Supreme Court failed to adhere to a correct interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The U.S. Supreme Court decision vacated the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision, which had determined that noncompete agreements in two employment contracts were null and void. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, it was for an arbitrator—not the state court—to decide whether the covenants-not-to-compete were valid as a matter of state law. (Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Howard, No. 11–1377, U.S. Supreme Court, 2012)

Arbitration required

The underlying decision involved two employees, Eddie Lee Howard and Shane D. Schneider, who worked for Nitro-Lift Technologies, a nitrogen-generating company with opera...(register to read more)

To read the rest of this article you must first register with your email address.

Email Address:

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: