Ignoring a discrimination complaint can set in motion an unstoppable litigation train wreck. That’s especially true if you fail to investigate a boss who ends up retaliating against the complaining employee.
Recent case: Michael Campbell, who is black, became one of the first branch managers at Enterprise Rent-A-Car. By most objective standards, Campbell was a good manager. His branch met all goals for sales, customer satisfaction, service and profits.
Campbell’s income was based in part on commissions, and he wanted to earn more. When an opening occurred at another branch, he let his supervisor know he was interested in the position. Instead, Enterprise picked a white manager whose previous branch had not performed as well as Campbell’s.
Campbell applied to manage two other branches, but his boss refused to release him for transfer, which Enterprise requires before seriously considering a candidate. Campbell complained to higher-ups that he was being discriminated against because of his race. Enterprise didn’t do anything about his complaint.
Shortly after, he was terminated, allegedly for making an error. When he showed he had not erred, he was rehired—only to be fired again for another alleged error, which he also claimed he didn’t make.
Campbell sued, alleging race discrimination and retaliation.
The court said a jury should decide whether he suffered discrimination—and retaliation for complaining in the first place. (Campbell v. Enterprise, No. 5:11-CV-424, ED NC, 2011)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Tossed: $10.5 million reverse bias suit against Ithaca PD
- Appeals court: Employee doesn't have to be first whistle-blower to be protected
- To claim religious bias, worker must first voice need for accommodation
- One less tune for whistle-blowers to play: Sarbanes-Oxley Act trumps Colorado common law