Paying women less, hoping for the best is recipe for Equal Pay Act disaster — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Paying women less, hoping for the best is recipe for Equal Pay Act disaster

Get PDF file

by on
in Compensation and Benefits,Discrimination and Harassment,Human Resources

Ignoring an employee’s persistent complaints that she’s being paid less than her male counterparts may amount to a willful violation of the Equal Pay Act (EPA). And willful violations add a year onto the two years of back-pay liability.

Recent case: Jean Grover rose through the ranks at Smarte Carte, an airport locker and cart service. She eventually became vice president and earned about $160,000 per year. Two male counterparts earned more—as much as $300,000.

Grover complained often and loudly to upper management about the difference. Finally, after hounding a senior manager for a year, she got stock options as partial compensation, although the company never admitted she was underpaid.

Later, she was terminated in a reduction in force in which she was the only employee cut. Grover sued, alleging EPA violations.

Smarte Carte argued that because she sold her stock options for over $1 million, that should be added to her total compensation. If that were the case, she out-earned the men.

The court disagreed. It said that averaging pay over many years after an employer remedies a complaint isn’t fair to the employee and would mean employers could wait until pushed to respond and avoid liability.

Then the court said that Grover could go back a full three years with her annual claims, because by ignoring her pleas for pay equity, the company willfully violated the EPA. (Grover v. Smarte Carte, No. 09-3282, DC MN, 2011)

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: