Paid suspensions are safer than unpaid ones — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Paid suspensions are safer than unpaid ones

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Human Resources

When you learn that an employee may have committed a crime or other offense that’s serious enough to warrant termination, you’ll naturally want to investigate before making a final decision. But do you suspend the employee in the meantime?

If you do, make sure the employee continues to be paid and continues to receive all his or her benefits. Then, move the investigation along as quickly as possible. Otherwise, you run the risk that the employee might sue, alleging some sort of discrimination and pointing to the suspension as an adverse employment action.

Recent case: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) suspended employee Gregson Joseph after he was arrested for allegedly stabbing his girlfriend. A week earlier, the agency received an anonymous tip suggesting Joseph was using his government car to buy cocaine.

The FDA suspended Joseph with full pay and began an investigation. It continued the investigation even after the criminal charges were dropped. Five months later, it allowed Joseph to return to work after concluding that he had done nothing wrong.

Joseph sued, alleging race discrimination. But the court dismissed his case, saying a paid suspension pending investigation wasn’t an adverse employment decision.

The court hinted that it might have ruled differently if the FDA had made any change in Joseph’s benefits during the suspension. (Joseph v. Leavitt, No. 05-3348, 2nd Cir., 2006)  

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: