Firing ‘Worst of the best’ isn’t age discrimination — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Firing ‘Worst of the best’ isn’t age discrimination

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Firing,Human Resources,Leaders & Managers,Performance Reviews

If economic conditions force you to downsize, be prepared for lawsuits. That's especially true if no employees stand out as obvious poor performers who should be canned. In such cases, articulate that you have no choice but to fire "the worst of the best." Use employee evaluations that were prepared before the downsizing to justify your choices. That makes it hard for lawyers to paint a discriminatory picture.

Recent case: When MetLife targeted its data-analysis division for a rif, it selected the lowest-ranking employees for termination. The company selected Anthony Marione, even though he was performing at acceptable levels. He sued, alleging age bias, but the 3rd Circuit tossed out the case. Reason: Marione couldn't point to any evidence that MetLife's stated reason for his selection (to eliminate the "worst of the best") was a pretext for age discrimination. (Marione v. MetLife, No. 05-2359, 2006)  

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: