Handle application liars consistently: Reject all or none — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Handle application liars consistently: Reject all or none

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Employment Background Check,Employment Law,Firing,Human Resources

As an employer, you can't always wait on a background check before offering a job, so you have to rely on applicants' oral and written statements to make the offer. But when the background check comes back to reveal that the person lied, you have the absolute right to terminate that individual for dishonesty.

Just make sure you treat all similar offenses the exact same way. You can't quickly fire one "marginal" new hire for an application fabrication, yet overlook the same transgression by a star employee. Such inconsistencies give great fodder for discrimination lawsuits. Here's an example of a company that did it right:

Recent case: Junet Caldor, a black male, was offered a job as a 911 operator with Onondaga County, contingent on a drug screen and criminal background check. He was given a copy of the employee handbook, which stated that falsifying an application was grounds for discharge.

While Caldor's application stated that he'd never been convicted of a misdemeanor or a felony, it turned out that he did have a criminal record. He'd been convicted of resisting arrest, a misdemeanor. The county quickly fired him.

He sued for race discrimination, but the court dismissed the case. The county fired him for lying, and had warned him that lying was a firing offense. Because Caldor couldn't show that others had lied and kept their jobs, he had no case. (Caldor v. Onondaga County, No. 5:03-CV-00031, ND NY, 2006)  

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: