Judges don’t want your job. They don’t see courtrooms as publicly funded HR offices, and will often try to defer to employer decisions as much as possible. That’s a huge advantage for employers.
Capitalize on that by giving the court something to hang a favorable decision on. That something is often a clear and fair disciplinary process.
Judges love it when employers give their employees a chance to improve. They like to see reasonable and objective. They want to see records (created contemporaneously) showing all those efforts and how the employee responded.
The result: Employees who fail to rise to the occasion don’t usually fare well in court.
Recent case: James Haigh was 60 years old when he went to work for Gelita as a senior process engineer. Because he had been involved in a car accident before joining the company, he needed reasonable accommodations. Those included the help of an assistant to ...(register to read more)
- Don't marginalize harassing behavior--you could trigger constructive discharge suit
- Manager's Checkup: Communicating with your boss
- Employee resigns in the middle of litigation? Courts unlikely to order you to change policies
- N.Y.-Based grocery chain to pay $40,000 discrimination settlement
- When are new hires eligible for health insurance?