Sometimes, it’s possible for an employee to have two employers. That’s often the case when a temporary service provides workers for a client, and both the temp company and the client exercise significant control over how and when the work is performed.
But now there’s a new wrinkle. The Court of Appeal of California has refused to extend this joint-employer concept to a company that handled the details ofand workers’ compensation insurance and listed itself as the employer on tax filings and other government forms.
Recent case: John Futrell’s work involves providing freelance security services during the production of television commercials. In 2002, Reactor Films, a production company, engaged Futrell and other temporary workers to work on its commercials. Reactor outsourced the payroll and insurance functions to a company called Payday California.
Payday listed itself as the employer on paystubs, tax filings and o...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Small Business Tax Deduction Strategies
- Title alone doesn't make someone a manager
- Texas anti-bias agency pays $900,000—for retaliation
- Bridgewater P.D. must defend against 2 employee lawsuits
- Don't tolerate employees' abuse of union rights