How not to manage HR: Forget about formal hiring and promotions processes — Business Management Daily: Free Reports on Human Resources, Employment Law, Office Management, Office Communication, Office Technology and Small Business Tax Business Management Daily
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

How not to manage HR: Forget about formal hiring and promotions processes

Get PDF file

by on
in Discrimination and Harassment,Hiring,HR Management,Human Resources,Leaders & Managers,Management Training

Sometimes, the best lessons are learned from the worst examples. That’s often the case with HR management. When employers make big mistakes and have to pay for them in court, other employers with good practices—that maybe need just a little tweaking—can discover what not to do.

Recent case: Three women who claim they were stuck in dead-end jobs while working for the Manhattan grocery store chain Gristede’s sued their employer, alleging sex discrimination. They asked the court to let them represent all other similarly situated women working for the company.

Each claimed she had applied for a job with Gristede’s and that she was steered into a part-time cashier position. Meanwhile, male applicants were placed in more desirable part-time clerk positions. The women said they remained stuck as cashiers while they watched their male counterparts move up the ladder into higher-paying management positions.

In court, Gristede’s had to explain its hiring and promotion practices—such as they were.

The company had a corporate manager who essentially served as the HR department. Although he had an undergraduate degree in HR, he had no further training and testified that no one at the company had given him any instructions on discrimination laws.

Plus, he said that the company had no job descriptions, no formal hiring policies, no set promotions processes and no method for applicants or employees to find out about job openings or how to apply.

When asked how he chose applicants to hire or promote, he said he based his decisions strictly on how the applicants handled themselves during the interview and whether they were friendly and honest.

The women called in an expert witness, a statistician who had analyzed hiring and promotion at Gristede’s. He testified that there was a 100% probability that sex discrimination was occurring. Essentially, he said, Gristede’s segregated employees by sex and promoted only men through a word-of-mouth process.

The combination of the company’s testimony and that of the statistician was enough to persuade the court to let the case go to trial as a class-action lawsuit. (Duling, et al., v. Gristede’s Operating Corporation, No. 06-CIV-10197, SD NY, 2010)

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: