10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review: Examples and tips on writing employee reviews, performance evaluation, sample performance review and employee evaluation forms.

How do you answer "Why did you leave your job?"

Question: “When called for a reference, my former employer tells prospective employers all of my strengths, but it also says I was terminated.  The reason given is that the position had changed from the time I was hired five years ago and I was no longer a good fit.  I believe  I was laid off because I got a generous severance package and unemployment.  How should I answer this tough question?  I already lost one job offer because I said I was laid off, and that did not match the employer's reason, so they thought I was hiding something.  What should I say?  I was never on probation, disciplined, written up or warned so it was a big surprise when it happened.  The company did not replace me, the other five admins split my responsibilities, and the company "terminated" three other people after me.” – Anonymous


See Comments Below


10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review: Examples and tips on writing employee reviews, performance evaluation, sample performance review and employee evaluation forms.


15 Responses to "How do you answer "Why did you leave your job?""

 
Cynthia
said this on 27 Mar 2009 2:39:30 PM EST
I would deal with the "termination" word from the source from the start. Also share the positives that you shared in your email. In this case, being forthright could work to your advantage. Also, since your job was abolished, I would ask the person you gave as a reference to explain the use of the term "terminated" instead of "laid off" or "position abolished".

 
Teena
said this on 27 Mar 2009 2:46:58 PM EST
I would include as a sidebar note (remaining as brief as possible) ex: due to the economy and the company's recent restructuring/reorganization, your job was deleted. Your termination was not due to poor performance. Then I would subtly "guide" the person checking your references to ask the RIGHT questions. Did this former employee serve you well? Were they teachable? If you had the opportunity to rehire this former employee would you? You mentioned above your former employer listed all your strengths, I would focus on those strengths given the opportunity for a follow-up interview, along with any additional continuing training, education or experience you may have gained since your termination. Also, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH about the company you are interviewing with. Then you will know how to better answer the questions you are being asked -- and still answer them honestly.

 
Diane
said this on 27 Mar 2009 2:51:35 PM EST
Be careful with this one because, In Illionios anyway, a former employer is allowed by law only to comment on the dates of hire and termination. They are not allowed to comment on why you were released.

 
gohughes
said this on 27 Mar 2009 2:53:24 PM EST
I would suggest you say your position was terminated and your duties were split between other admins. This would be in line with your former employers response that you were terminated. In HR the word terminated simply means "ended" and does not, and should not, be misconstrued to always mean discharged or fired.

 
Susie
said this on 27 Mar 2009 2:54:06 PM EST
I was in the same situation a few years ago. I kept it short and simple by stating that my position had been eliminated. No one ever questioned that statement (it was true for me and it appears to be true for you), and I received several job offers, so I don't think it hurt me at all. You could also contact your former employer and ask that they also say the position was eliminated instead of using "terminated".

 
Diane Johnson-Hung
said this on 27 Mar 2009 5:40:56 PM EST
I would say exactly what you said toward the end; "The job had changed from what it was five years ago, and I was no longer a good fit. The company split my remaining responsibilities among the remaining administrative assistants." Then I would go on to talk about your past reviews with that company (right up until the time they let you go) and how you were evaluated. I was in the same spot as you, and this is how I overcame that obstacle.

 
JoJo
said this on 30 Mar 2009 2:24:16 PM EST
If you place on the application "position terminated" this would conicide better with what the company is telling protential employers. I would also in an interview tell them as you did in your email "the job had changed from what it was five years ago, and I was no longer a good fit" . You may want to also speak to the HR of the former company and request a letter outlining what had occurred or ask if they would let potential employers know it was not you but the position that was terminated.

 
Marie
said this on 01 Apr 2009 7:09:46 PM EST
Ask your previous manager to write you a letter of recommendation on company letterhead and sign a number of originals for you to give to targeted employers. When you submit your letter of interest with your resume and application, you can mention your letter of recommendation. Be sure to bring it with you to your interview. Good Luck!

 
Another Anon
said this on 03 Apr 2009 4:44:10 PM EST
This happened to me a few years ago and I put position was cut from the budget. I have had 3 new jobs (all promotions) since then. No questions were ever asked.

Floridian

 
Cindy
said this on 03 Apr 2009 5:00:44 PM EST
I would also use your cover letter as a tool to clarify the "termination of your position" leaving you "terminated" as well. People can gleam a lot from how a person represents themselves within the cover letters they send with their resumes. The resumes state the employers, positions, and job related tasks, but the cover letter details more about the individual behind the resume.

 
Mark
said this on 03 Apr 2009 5:30:04 PM EST
Diane, actually, in Illinois an employer is allowed to give specific reasons why a person was terminated. They can give any work-related information to prospective employers (regardless of if the employee was terminated, resigned, or laid off) as long as what they say is documented and on file.

I am wondering if part of the problem here could be that the person was not laid off but was actually terminated (fired) and only thinks it qualifies as a layoff because of the severance and unemployment. In Illinois, being fired does qualify for someone to get unemployment (but quitting doesn't) as long as it was not for gross negligence or dereliction or duty. In addition, many people are given severance packages even though it is considered to be a termination and not a layoff.

I don't think the person is lying in the question above. I just wonder if they misunderstand what really happened when they were let go. From the way it reads, it sounds like they were terminated/fired, not laid off.

 
Liz
said this on 04 Apr 2009 10:05:27 AM EST
I like Cindy's suggestion of saying the position was terminated, therefore, you were, in turn, let go.

However, Mark's feeling were nagging me from the start. Having been laid off in a downsizing situation, the company you worked for will probably readily admit to "an economic reduction in force causeing your job to be eliminated". (By the way, this was the catch-phrase we were instructed by outsourcing professionals.) They will also gladly provide a letter for you to use, as suggested by several people.

There is a different connotation in being laid off and terminated. An employee that is being terminated for cause will often receive some sort of severance ... even if only a couple of weeks. In actuality, everyone leaving a job is terminated, the reason is varied.

 
Frankel
said this on 06 Apr 2009 12:30:53 PM EST
I was in this situation 8 years ago when my position was eliminated due to budget cuts. In my resume, letters of references and interviews, I noted that the release was due to a reduction in force and stated that my previous supervisor(s) would be available to speak to them. I am facing the same situtation again having received my reduction in force letter three weeks ago. With the economy and jobs scarce, I am very worried this time I will not be as fortunate this time.

 
aaa
said this on 27 Oct 2009 1:07:22 AM EST
Why wow player needs [url=http://www.pvpbutt.com]wow gold[/url] spend so much time yourself grinding for

 
aaa
said this on 27 Oct 2009 8:17:38 PM EST
Wholesale Rolex replica watches is the most wholewatches, As well known replica watches wristwatch brand in the world replica watches and one rolex watches of the most expensive rolex watches in the world rolex watches. Unfortunately, Rolex are being copied like many other over priced brand name replica rolex watches. Lots of people replica rolex watches are willing to replica rolex watches wear the fake one replica breitling if they cannot afford a genuine replica breitling watches in order to replica tag heuer watches satisfy their vanity replica tag heuer watches because it is replica cartier watches worn by replica cartier watches people who are replica omega watches considered to be rich. Rolex watches are the status symbol as much as what Rolls Royce car is. Basically a replica Rolex is an identical copy of the real replica omega watches, which looks the same on the surface. Generally speaking, it is quite difficult to tell the difference between an original and a fake Rolex.




Leave a reply:
Your Name *: Email (private): Website:
Please copy the characters from the image below into the text field below. Doing this helps us prevent automated submissions.
Security Code: img