Question: Open mouth. Insert foot. Taste a lawsuit? The district manager at the Foot Locker did.
In
a surprising court ruling, a judge decided that only “one comment” made
by the district manager about the store manager’s age was enough to
hand him his walking papers - into court that is (Barnes v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. D. Kan. 3/9/07). Click here for the Age Discrimination case.
Usually,
there is the tried-and-true “isolated comment” defense that employers
argue and many courts will buy into. It looks like this: “It was just
one time.” Or, “The manager didn’t mean it. Mea culpa, let us go!” But,
in this situation the court kicked that defense out of play completely.
What does this new ruling mean to you?
“Isolated
comments about age that are unrelated to a contested employment action
do not show discriminatory animus,” the court stated. However, the
judge thought differently here. So what were the words that stepped
over the line? Appearently, the senior manager told his store manager,
an employee of seven years, that the company wanted a “younger more
aggressive manager” in his job. (The kicker was the manager was only
42!)
You know the drill. Eventually the 42 year old was
fired for poor performance. Foot Locker argued that it did not fire the
store manager because of his age. Smells stinky, doesn’t it?
Yup,
the court smelled it, too. While Foot Locker hired a new store manager
who was 23 years old, it argued that he really was not a replacement
because the new guy did not do everything the previous store manager
did. But, the court declared that defense was not a proper fit. The
judge decided the “replaced by a younger person” requirement was “not
to be rigidly applied.”
Lessons Learned ... Without Going to Court
- Protect age in all your EEO policies. The
EEOC has a relatively new initiative called, “The Task Force on
Systemic Discrimination.” It is looking for discrimination in all
employment practices including hiring, promotion, performance
management, performance documentation and termination. Chaiman Naomi
Earp has stated, “Employers all across the country should expect
aggressive investigations and litigation by the Commission.” Believe
her.
- Remember the new “It-Only-Takes-One” rule. Bite
your tongue. Don’t say it. You are on notice now that it only takes one
comment about a protected characteristic, like age, to get sued.
- Focus on the job description for performance. It
is all about whether someone is doing the job or not doing the job
according to the expectations listed in the job description. That’s it.
It is not about their age, so don’t make it about that. If you link the
two concepts, you will end up in court.
- Avoid all comments about age.
While federal laws protect employees at age 40, states reserve the
right to protect employees at any age. For example, some states protect
employees from age discrimination at age 18 and others protect
employees from birth on. A good company policy will protect all employees from harassment and discrimination based on their age, no matter how many candles were on the last cake.
- Avoid all comments about protected characteristics.
Don’t forget that best practices apply not only to age but to all
protected characteristics, like race, religion, disabilites, national
origin and any other protected characteristics under federal, state and
local laws. Stay away from all comments about these areas.
- Share your organization’s strategic plans.
If your company wants to increase the competancies of their management,
like increase aggressive sales skills, then share that vision. That is
probably shat should have happened here. It is quite different than a
manager thinking (and telling everyone) the corporate vision is
replacing the old with the new.
- Train managers.
Untrained managers and supervisors are walking time bombs for
liability. They need to be trained on how to manage within the law from
hiring through termination to heighten their awareness about what they
can and cannot do and say.