Mindy is a nationally recognized authority in EEO laws and is a contributing editor to the HR Specialist: Employment Law
monthly newsletter. She is highly regarded for her workplace compliance
training that “clicks and sticks,” because it is practical and
memorable. She is also the coauthor of the American Bar Association’s
bestseller and authority on civil rights training, “Case Dismissed! Taking Your Harassment Prevention Training to Trial."
The Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) has recognized Mindy as one of its Top Ten Speakers nationally. She has trained extensively in all industries at all levels of the
workforce—from boardroom executives to managers and supervisors and to
hourly employees in union and non-union environments.
You’re a tolerant, open-minded person. You’ve hired people of all races and religions, including a woman who wears a head scarf (hijab) in accordance with her religion. But what do say when that woman seeks a promotion to a more visible position? A few unwise words coupled with foot-dragging on the promotion and you’ll be wrapping your head around a religious discrimination lawsuit …
Case in Point: Angela Harper was a 20-year-old African American Muslim who wore a hijab for modesty in respect of her religion. An Ellensburg, Washington, restaurant hired her for a dishwasher job. Eventually, she asked a restaurant manager to be promoted to waitress. She was permitted to work only the less lucrative shifts of breakfast and lunch.
Harper asked to work the better dinner and cocktail shifts but was told no openings were available. However, over the next two years, the restaurant hired eight white employees as cocktail and dinner waitresses. Harper was eventually allowed to cover the dinner shifts for other employees as needed, but wasn’t give a full-time dinner shift.
The restaurant owner tried to justify her decision and insisted she was “not a bigot.” The owner told Harper, “it wasn’t about your race, it was more about your scarf thing. You know how people in Ellensburg are? They’re not gonna want to see, you know, a girl like that on the cocktail shift … It was a business decision, it was nothing against you.”
Eventually, the owner offered Harper a cocktail server position but the employee felt the offer was insincere and quit. She filed an EEOC claim for religious discrimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in the workplace based on protected characteristics, including religion. (EEOC v. Starlight LLC, 8/04/08)
What happened next … and what lessons can be learned?
The court this month agreed with Harper that she deserved a trial. It sent the case to a jury to decide the restaurant’s fate. The court said the owner’s after-the-fact promotion offer “was disingenuous, a mere Potemkin village designed to mask [the owner’s] disparaging comments and appearance of impropriety.”
3 Lessons Learned … Without Having To Go To Court
1. Zip it. Don’t ask, inquire or speculated about an employee’s religious beliefs, clothing or jewelry. The owner wanted to know if Harper could “wear a fancier headdress” possibly so she looked “hotter” when serving cocktails. The court looked upon such an inquiry as religious animosity.
2. Train managers, supervisors and executives that intentions don’t count, perceptions do. It didn’t matter that the owner was inquiring about “the whole Muslim thing” (as she so crassly put it) to become better educated. The employee perceived such comments to be signs of discriminatory beliefs.3. Hire and promote based only on skills and talent. Even the restaurant’s manager agreed that Harper was qualified to be promoted. Why would the owner ignore her wise manager and say she wanted “really gorgeous girls” to serve cocktails? Maybe the owner will learn that looks shouldn’t matter—surely she wasn’t concerned with the looks of whoever “served” her the subpoena for this lawsuit!

|
|