Employers have to reasonably accommodate disabilities, and those accommodations may include reduced hours or time off. However, employees aren’t entitled to paid time off.
Recent case: Shawnetta Graham was a library worker at a juvenile detention facility when she slipped on ice and hurt her knee and ankle. From then on, she had trouble standing and walking.
Her employer offered to accommodate her with medical leave until she could return to work. She took the leave but then sued, alleging that she had lost pay while out.
The court rejected her claim, explaining that disabled employees may be entitled to time off to deal with the disability, but it doesn’t have to be paid time off. If employees don’t have accumulated sick or vacation time, they are simply out of luck. (Graham v. State of Illinois, No. 07-C-7078, ND IL, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9883/ada-accommodation-yes-to-time-off-no-to-paid-time-off "
- Court: EEOC paperwork foul-up doesn't cancel right to sue under N.C. law
- Make sure post-firing documentation doesn't pile on extra reasons for termination
- Don't use nepotism policy as smoke screen for bias
- Pittsburgh YMCA execs allege gender-, race-based pay bias
- One instance of sex-based pay is enough to prove discrimination