All by itself, a negative
Advice: Never consider holding leave against an employee. Base your review strictly on work performed while the employee wasn’t on leave.
Recent case: Shakeel Tirmizi took FMLA leave to care for his autistic son. When he returned, he got a performance review that was lower than one he received before he took time off.
He sued, alleging retaliation. But the court tossed out the case, reasoning that a review that didn’t trigger something like a demotion or lost pay isn’t an adverse employment action. (Kramer, et al., v. Exxon, No. 07-0436, DC NJ, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9702/poor-review-not-grounds-for-fmla-retaliation-suit "
- Set up systems to prevent employee sabotage
- Ensure your FMLA practices comply with new GINA regulations
- Must we pursue reasonable accommodation if employee could never return to work?
- Stop FMLA moonlighters with strict 'no moonlighting on leave' policy
- Caregiver leave: Was this firing disability discrimination?