Before an employee can sue for retaliation, she has to show she participated in some form of protected activity—filing an EEOC or internal discrimination complaint, for example.
But what about refusing to cooperate with an employer’s investigation?
Recent case: Carolyn Miller is of German descent. A statue of a German soldier and a fake military certificate showed up on her desk.
When HR learned about the incident, it told Miller to remove the items while it investigated. Miller refused to cooperate, perceiving the demand as anti-Germanic discrimination.
She was fired shortly after and sued, alleging she was fired for refusing to participate in the investigation.
The court dismissed the case, concluding such a refusal was not protected activity. (Miller v. Empress Casino, No. 09-C-760, ND IL, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9632/declining-to-cooperate-with-investigation-isnt-protected "
- Downsized Work Force, Supersized Liability: The Legal Risks of Layoffs
- Think lawsuit won't materialize? Test theory on calendar
- Employee pushing envelope on HR policies? Maybe he's not best for job with lots of rules
- Business interference is tough to prove in Pennsylvania
- HR certification rules to get tougher, starting in 2011