The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in a long-running case that a jury acted properly when it concluded an employer’s retroactive termination of health insurance violated the
Advice: Always think about how a jury will view your decisions.
Recent case: Kathleen Ryl-Kuchar learned she was pregnant with triplets and began working from home. After giving birth, she went back to work.
Later, she asked for . That’s when her employer canceled her health insurance retroactively, ostensibly because it discovered she had fallen below full-time status when she worked from home. That left her with unpaid medical bills.
A sympathetic jury determined the employer had punished her for taking FMLA leave, and the 7th Circuit agreed. It said the jury’s conclusion was reasonable. (Ryl-Kuchar v. Care Centers, No. 08-2688, 7th Cir., 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9631/always-consider-how-jury-might-see-retroactive-actions "
- Management 101: Five legal lessons your supervisors must learn
- 'Reasonable' Maternity Leave Doesn't Matter Under FMLA
- Return pregnant employee to equivalent job
- You're not a doctor! Don't restrict pregnant employee's work unless her physician says so
- Obesity equals higher absenteeism, workers' comp costs