Calvin Keeler started as a senior vice president overseeing 85 employees. He earned bonuses exceeding $30,000 while enjoying a large office. Within a few years, he had been downgraded to a vice president with no bonus and no staff. He even lost his big office and parking space.
During his gradual decline, Keeler took care of his sick wife and often had to take time off work under theAct ( ). In a review, the company noted that these absences had caused his attendance to become unpredictable. Keeler sued.
A court dismissed his claim, saying that legitimatecan cause serious problems in employees' performances, and that not every employer comment about those problems is considered an adverse employment action that violates the FMLA. (Keeler v. Putnam Fiduciary Trust Co., No. 00-1237, 1st Cir., 2001)
"Keeler's loss of responsibilities and staff, even his lower rating and the elimination of bonuses, are part of a downward trajectory that began long before" he took leave, the court said.
Advice: This case highlights a key Labor Department regulation: It's illegal to use an employee's FMLA leave as a negative factor when determining employment actions, such as promotion, hiring and discipline.
You can, however, communicate with the employee about anycaused by the leave. Just don't let the leave itself be a trigger for your decisions affecting the employee's pay, position or conditions of employment.
- ADA ruling: Coming to work is an essential job function
- Supreme Court OKs Arizona's work authorization law
- What are the new rules on observation of DOT-mandated drug and alcohol tests?
- Court: Applicants must apply first before they sue for hiring discrimination
- Get all facts straight before deciding to discharge