Pennsylvania common law protects employees from discharges that violate public policy, but what violates public policy isn’t defined.
Courts must therefore decide what the term means. For example, the term has led to a finding that firing someone for making a workers’ compensation claim violates public policy.
The good news is that courts appear reluctant to expand the law to cover many other circumstances.
Recent case: Donna Henderson claimed she was fired from her job with NutriSystem because she was ill and needed to be off work. She had a cold. Because she didn’t call in properly, the company fired her.
She sued, arguing that she had been terminated in violation of public policy. The court refused to expand the law to cover being fired for having a minor illness. (Henderson v. NutriSystem, No. 08-592, ED PA, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9514/nothing-to-sneeze-at-reach-of-wrongful-discharge-law-limited "