The Supreme Court on May 18 ruled that women whose retirement benefits are worth less because they weren’t credited for time spent on before enactment of the can’t sue to recover lost funds.
The 7-2 decision in AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen generally followed the reasoning the High Court used in its landmark Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber ruling: If a policy was legal at the time alleged discrimination occurred, employees can’t challenge it retroactively.
Retiring Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion.
Some observers had worried that the AT&T case could reopen wounds closed by Ledbetter and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act that was signed into law in its wake.
According to employment law attorney Michael Fox, of the Ogletree Deakins law firm, “What was always a long shot for a quick look at the newest employment legislation did not pan out, as the Supreme Cou...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- It's OK to discipline employees for public displays of affection
- Transferring an employee may be retaliation, but merely discussing a transfer isn't
- The ADA requirements for accommodating depression and psychiatric disabilities
- Doing half a job is not a reasonable accommodation request