Texas courts ordinarily reject noncompete agreements that require employees not to disclose confidential information if the employer has failed to provide the employee with that confidential information. But now the Texas Supreme Court has modified that stance.
Recent case: Brendan Fielding signed on with an accounting firm to perform accounting work, and agreed not to use confidential information if he left the firm. When he left, he tried to use client information, and his former employer sued. The Texas Supreme Court ruled that the agreement, even without the employer’s promise to provide confidential information, was valid.
The court reasoned that an accountant always receives confidential information from clients, and doesn’t need a promise from his employer. (Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp v. Fielding, No. 07-0490, Supreme Court of Texas, 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9360/texas-supreme-court-upholds-noncompete-agreement "
- Differing male and female grooming standards may signal opening for religious accommodation
- 3 federal tests: Are workers employees or independent contractors?
- Unlike employees, partners can't pursue bias claims under employment laws
- Make legally smart job offers; avoid 'implied' contracts
- NLRB requires Oakland employer to release confidential docs