A federal court has awarded more than $100,000—plus enhanced pension benefits—to an employee who was fired when the company wrongly believed his
Recent case: Carl Thom took leave for shoulder surgery and was scheduled to return on a set date. He didn’t come back, but told the company he needed more time because of pain. It fired him after concluding his FMLA leave was up.
He sued, alleging he had never been told the company was using the rolling-calendar method to calculate eligibility.
The court said that meant the employer had to use the method most favorable to Thom, which meant he was fired while still eligible for FMLA leave.
The court said Thom was owed more than $100,000 in back pay. Thom also missed accruing pension benefits, so the company must restore those as well. (Thom v. American Standard, No. 3:07-CV-294, ND OH, 2009)
- Be sure to document if worker says she doesn't need leave
- No FMLA? That doesn't mean you're free to fire and replace new mother
- You don't have to ask for FMLA certification for every absence
- Hacked! Limiting employer liability for breaches of employee data
- Does FMLA cover 'Emotional care' of spouse in ICU?