Fired employees with vengeance on their minds often go looking for a reason to sue. They often latch on to the charge that they complained about discrimination and then were punished.
As the following case shows, it takes more than a casual mention of diversity to constitute a protected action.
Recent case: Tony Hood, who is black, was having . Then, at a town hall-style meeting, Hood raised his hand and asked upper why there wasn’t much being done to promote diversity in his department.
After Hood was fired, he sued, alleging retaliation under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination.
The court dismissed Hood’s case because his comment didn’t amount to protected activity. (Hood v. Pfizer, No. 08-1434, 3rd Cir., 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9322/merely-speaking-about-need-for-diversity-isnt-protected "