If your organization uses
Instead, have them apply the rules firmly and evenhandedly.
Recent case: Carrie Watson worked for Lowe’s until she was fired for poor attendance under the company’s progressive discipline, no-fault attendance program. In four months, she missed work or was late 16 times.
She claimed she had been singled out for termination for two reasons—because she is a woman and because she had complained about two male co-workers who allegedly harassed her about women’s rights.
But the retailer was able to show the court that at around the same time it had fired a male co-worker for the same number of absences that Watson had incurred. The court dismissed Watson’s case because she couldn’t prove someone outside her protected class had been treated more leniently. (Watson v. Lowe’s Home Centers, No. 04-70491, ED MI, 2009)
Final note: Have someone in HR spot-check that supervisors are handling attendance fairly. Check time records, match them up with attendance policy “strikes” and have supervisors explain any discrepancies. A no-fault attendance plan won’t work if some employees are allowed to arrive late or miss work, while others are held to the rules.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- EEOC says it's legal to 'encourage' minorities to apply; but don't say you're 'seeking' them
- Supervisor bias creates employer liability: Never ignore charges that boss used racial epithet
- Prompt corrective action limits harassment liability
- You don't have to ignore harmful effect of absences