When weighing the evidence in a lawsuit involving, courts consider many factors:
Employee’s reasonable expectations. While the disclaimer may declare that the employment relationship is strictly at-will and nothing in the handbook should be considered a contract, judges tend to look at the reasonable expectations of the employee involved. For instance, in Derrig v. Wal-Mart, the court noted that the employee understood what the rules were in the handbook and was familiar with the system ofdescribed in it. The court decided it was reasonable for the employee to expect that the company would abide by its own rules.
Conspicuous disclaimer. When the handbook contains a disclaimer, where is it located? Would a typical employee see it? In one case a U.S. District Court in Colorado ruled that the company may have created a contract in its (register to read more)because the disclaimer was burie...
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Track timing on discrimination suits; missed federal deadlines can kill state claims, too
- Avoid the pitfalls of social media: The FCRA and EEOC angle
- Monitoring the virtual water cooler: Facebook and beyond
- As boomers gray, Minnesota employers could see silver lining