Employees who return from are supposed to come back to the same or a substantially equivalent position. Don’t make the mistake of offering a position that has the same title and pay, but which involves very different duties. -covered
That’s especially true if those duties are more onerous for a new mother, as happened in the following case.
Recent case: Nicole Myers worked as a district manager for Mothers Work, a manufacturer and retailer of maternity clothes. Then she announced her pregnancy. According to Myers, things started going downhill at work soon after. She received negative and was suspended without pay for several weeks. Finally, Myers gave birth and went on .
When she was ready to come back, Mothers Work informed her she wouldn’t get the same district to manage. Instead, she was offered the same title, but in a different district. The practical effect was that she would have to travel farther than she had to before she became pregnant and had her baby. She refused to take the assignment.
She then sued, alleging that she should have been reinstated to a truly equivalent position.
Mothers Work tried to argue that the jobs were equivalent. The court didn’t buy it and ordered a jury trial. (Myers v. Mothers Work, No. H-07-0409, SD TX, 2009)
Final note: Consider settling cases like this, which generate terrible publicity.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- Buy the old folks' home, lease it back
- One wrong word can launch a lawsuit: Warn bosses about the danger of ageist comments
- How long do we need to hold job for employee out for workers' comp injury?
- Base reinstatement on job held at time leave began