In Pennsylvania, employers that make a promise that an employee reasonably relies on may be liable if that promise isn’t fulfilled and the employee suffers harm as a result.
This quasi-contract theory has implications: If you don’t have enough employees at a particular location to be covered by the FMLA, don’t approve requests.
Recent case: Tracy Moore asked for medical leave after reading about it in . Her employer granted her two weeks of FMLA leave. Moore then was fired for unrelated reasons. Nonetheless, she filed an and interference lawsuit. The company said it wasn’t required to provide FMLA leave.
The court allowed the case to continue, judging that Moore might have taken vacation time off if she hadn’t been promised FMLA leave. To her detriment, she relied on the company’s promise. (Moore v. Czarnowski, No. 08-1637, WD PA, 2009)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Big ruling: Supreme Court limits scope of pay-discrimination lawsuits
- Take responsibility for preventing harassment, discrimination
- Hidden risk: Do your staff committees violate labor law?
- No second opinion? You can challenge FMLA leave later