Sometimes, employees think they can save themselves from being disciplined by making a fuss about possible employer wrongdoing. They assume that whistle-blowing will protect them from being fired, for example, because their employer’s timing will look suspect.
Smart employers don’t fall for this. Instead, they make certain they have good, fair and solid reasons for whatever disciplinary actions they take. They sleep soundly knowing it takes more than just suspicious timing to win a whistle-blower retaliation lawsuit—and that they have evidence on their side.
Recent case: Kevin Noyes was discharged about five months after he claims to have blown the whistle on his employer. But Noyes had nothing to tie the discharge to his protected whistle-blowing activity. Timing alone isn’t enough. (Noyes v. American Tissue Services Foundation, No. 08-1445, 8th Cir., 2009)
- Hey, boss, you better call HR! Warn managers against trying to resolve complaints informally
- Cal State Fresno settles coach's bias claim for $5.2 million
- ADA requires accommodation of customers with service dogs
- What you can do to prevent sexual harassment
- Some Sundays off doesn't require giving every Sunday off