Sometimes, employees think they can save themselves from being disciplined by making a fuss about possible employer wrongdoing. They assume that whistle-blowing will protect them from being fired, for example, because their employer’s timing will look suspect.
Smart employers don’t fall for this. Instead, they make certain they have good, fair and solid reasons for whatever disciplinary actions they take. They sleep soundly knowing it takes more than just suspicious timing to win a whistle-blower retaliation lawsuit—and that they have evidence on their side.
Recent case: Kevin Noyes was discharged about five months after he claims to have blown the whistle on his employer. But Noyes had nothing to tie the discharge to his protected whistle-blowing activity. Timing alone isn’t enough. (Noyes v. American Tissue Services Foundation, No. 08-1445, 8th Cir., 2009)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/9031/coincidental-timing-alone-does-not-make-a-retaliation-claim "
- Cable installers will split $270,000 in back overtime pay
- Reporting suspected harassment doesn't always equal 'Protected activity'
- Justice Department sues judge, courts for USERRA violations
- Warning: Winning in state court doesn't mean you can't be sued in federal court
- Settlement leaves weight loss firm $20 million lighter